Comments (0)

By Jeff Pierce, 25 December 2009 14:47

How could I not open this book?

Eating the Dinosaur

This section below, from page 19, hooked me. I know that even if the rest of the book is total rubbish, I have to finish it.¹ The opening essay explores the question “Why do people take part in interviews?”, and this bit expands on a quote from Chris Heath, British music critic.

>>>>>begin excerpt<<<<<

“We are used to the idea of giving witness to one’s life as an important and noble counterpoint to being /unheard, especially when applied to people in certain disadvantaged, oppressed or unacceptable situations. But in a slightly more pathological way, I’m not sure that we aren’t seeing the emergence of a society in which almost everyone who isn’t famous considers themselves cruelly and unfairly unheard. As though being famous, and the subject of wide attention, is considered to be a fulfilled human being’s natural state – and so, as a corollary, the cruelly unheard millions are perpetually primed and fired up to answer any and all questions in order to redress this awful imbalance.”

There’s a lot of truth in that last bit. I fear that most contemporary people are answering questions not because they’re flattered by the attention; they’re answering questions because they feel as though they deserve to be asked. About everything. Their opinions are special, so they are entitled to a public forum. Their voice is supposed to be heard, lest their life become empty.

This, in one paragraph (minus technology), explains the rise of New Media.

>>>>end excerpt<<<<<

I have two thoughts on this. Not as well written as Klosterman’s, but hey.

1) This articulates the fuzziness and messiness of blogs and how they relate to self-identity, which I haltingly explored in some posts earlier this year.

2) Klosterman leaves out a huge bit with that paranthetical remark on technology, so big as to misrepresent the real process going on with what he terms New Media. There’s a feedback loop going on between technology and culture. Without the possibility and new frontiers that the new technology opens up, in particular the ability to speak to Anyone in the world, is what even lets you think in the first place that you deserve to be seen and heard by millions.

Comments (2)

By Jeff Pierce, 25 August 2009 14:48

Here’s an attempt to try to define this blog and what I’m doing here. I would love to give you my word that  nothing communist will appear on this blog, but after some of the topics that were covered in my module on Multiculturalism, I don’t think I could make good on that promise.

I digress. The definition fits: “a public declaration of intentions”.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/61683005@N00/565924862

In this first iteration of my attempt to define online professionalism I will simply expand on what I wrote earlier.

There were two guidelines I operated under:

1. Don’t use real names
2. Don’t post anything I wouldn’t want sent as an all-users email

I can see clearly how they stifled my last blog: they are “donts”, negative rules.

Let’s try this again:

1. Don’t use real names. Share my blog with people that I work with. Not that I expect to use this in any capacity related to my job, but because I don’t want to feel like I’m hiding anything from anyone.
2. Don’t post anything I wouldn’t want sent as an all-users email. I need to be excited about the fact that all-users can see what I write rather than cowed. When I post something onto this blog, I’m saying that it’s an idea worth sharing. If I post it here, I’m standing behind it (until someone comes along to show me, duh, why I’m wrong).

…is this enough? It doesn’t feel like it. I don’t like how open-ended and messy this sounds. But I can’t seem to find anything better anywhere else, yet.

I’ll have to come back to it. For now, thanks to all the blogs I’ve read, and in particular thanks to Karl Fisch and Konrad Glogowski, whose words seem to most match what I feel is appropriate.

Comments (0)

By Jeff Pierce, 12 August 2009 16:21

I really do want to move on from this meta-discussion on “what’s in a blog” and start writing up thoughts that more directly relate to education. But what did I find in my feed reader but a brilliant 30+ minute video that describes my initial hesitations with starting up a blog, in a very specific way, yet also encompasses the underlying philosophical issues of authentic identity and self.

If you maintain an online presence in any way – I am including facebook in that – watch 17:22 – 21:18. Four minutes, that’s all. This section introduces and defines “context collapse”, my big takeaway, the phenomenon which is the cause of all my stops and starts venturing online. (see end note for more)

<><><>

“Context Collapse”

On this blog, I am not writing to anyone in particular, yet I am also writing to everyone in the whole world. And thus I have no context in which to set this text. Comparing blogs to emails is illustrative. Both are means of communication in which the authors of the ideas are clearly identified. But an email is highly contextualized since it is limited to a specific group of people, while a blog that is posted publicly on the internet is in a sense addressed to the whole world and therefore lacks a defined context.

For example, let’s look at my last post. Instead of putting my concerns online, I could have sent it to my school’s director of technology, Justin Hardman. Here’s what the email would look like:

Emailing Justin

But by putting it onto my blog, here is who I am addressing it to:

Blogging the Whole World

And it’s not like a normal “bcc” – in email, the people who are blind are the ones who actually receive the email, as they don’t know who else might be a recipient. But on a blog, I’m the one who is blind. I have absolutely no clue who is choosing to point their browser this way.

That’s the part that has me messed up. I am worried both about who specifically will come to view the blog – the wrong member of my school’s board, or the wrong overreacting parent. But I am also concerned with remaining authentic to whoever else in the world might come to view these ideas.

Not so worried that I won’t blog. But I find I can’t stop (over) thinking it.

<><><>

End Note: But I recommed the whole video. You can split it up into two manageable chunks – up until 14:00, the focus is on the philosophical ramifications of new digital media and how it is changing conceptions of self and identity. From 14:00 til the end, it summarizes Welsh’s ethnographic research into Youtube. Well worth the time!

Comments (5)

By Jeff Pierce, 6 August 2009 15:12

Thanks a bunch for those who have dropped by recently. For anyone with a blog of their own, please know that I will try my best to follow you if you post comments here. I am looking forward to making more connections and to receiving (and giving) feedback on ideas.

Just a short post here, to try to clarify what I meant by the word “professionalism”, because Kate wasn’t the only person to be unsure of what I meant.

I am deeply (overly?) concerned with what it means for an individual with a relationship to an institution to be blogging about their experiences. By choosing to state my real name on this website, I am acting as an unofficial representative of my school. My words here reflect back on my employer.

And I want to be professional about this relationship, but I also want to be authentic.

So – the question is, what does that mean? What does it look like? How do I remain authentic and honest and “jeff” and yet also not do anything to reflect badly on my employer in the eyes of anyone who has access to the internet?

In looking for a discussion on that issue, I’ve come up pretty much empty. I do have some ideas of an answer, but if anyone would like to take a stab at answering my question above, that would be fabulous.

Comments (2)

By Jeff Pierce, 15 July 2009 22:46

So to follow up from my previous post, I went hunting for models / discussions of how to start up a blog, and specifically, what it means to have professionalism online.

I started with a big player – Will Richardson – and specifically this page, where he has posted all sorts of resources and relevant links about blogs. I clicked on about a dozen links that seemed at first glance to be relevant.

And here, ladies and gentlemen, is a “retroactive live-blog” of the highlights of my one hour hunt. (Stealing a page from Bill Simmons – his passion and humor deserve all praise.)

<><><>

First Stop: Anne Davis.

Hmm. Nope, this is a post to get educators convinced of the value of the blog, both in and outside of the classroom. Not for me – I’m already converted!

But before I leave her page let me skim the right sidebar…wow, she’s been blogging since I was in college! Back then, all I did online was Napster. Maybe there’s something else to be found, under “Beginnings” (3 posts), or “Obstacles” (3 posts)…nope…and the category of “Weblogs” is too big to spend time on, with 349 posts.

Repeating the fruitlessness of this experience with the blogs of Clarence Fisher, Chris Lehmann, and Scott McLeod, I wonder if I’m going about this the wrong way? What else can I do in addition to scanning tags and categories and few searches?

We’ll try again: Konrad Glogowski

Vygotsky reference in the title of the blog is a plus. Nice prose as well – despite running on for substantially longer than your typical blog post.

Initial reaction is that this looks like more of the same, preaching to the converted, as the ideas in this post are on how to foster student blogging. But upon a closer reading of this related post, I wonder if what I am looking for isn’t contained in the ideas there. I also have the feeling after reading the bio that if I dive deeper into the archives I’ll find what I’m looking for here.

We end with one last flicker of hope: Karl Fisch.

I remember his blog fondly as one of the sparks for my first ever presentation on technology – it should still be alive online at slideshare here.

And it looks like with Karl I have again found something worthwhile! His last two posts are on the topic of protecting student identities online. Not directly related, but this would be a great chance for me to add my two cents and put in a question as well.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/76206184@N00/775521097

So – what did my hunt catch me? Konrad’s (dormant?) blog and archives which should occupy me for some time, and a “happening now” conversation related to this topic at The Fischbowl. Hopefully I have enough food for thought to formulate whatever will satisfy me as a “code of online professionalism”.

I have to say it, though – should I have had to look so hard for this? Or am I tilting at windmills when the answer to being “professional” online is something simple and right in front of my face?

Comments (1)

By Jeff Pierce, 15 July 2009 04:51

Here’s a new puzzle facing me on this fresh blog:

Am I allowed to refer to my professors by name?

The bigger issue is, what topics do I feel comfortable putting online? What’s fair game, what’s in season?

On my last blog, I was only blogging about specific lessons and how I saw my career progressing. I made it a rule to not mention any specific names, certainly not students, and to refrain from posting anything about my school that I wouldn’t want to email to all users. The result of this was that most of the issues and events that made me passionate and got my mind twirling stayed off of the blog. A bit of a conservative stance, but a safe one.

But with this fresh start on a new site, I want to expand my definition of what it means to have professionalism on a blog. There is so much more that I want to write about, so much more that I want to write to a level that I feel is “publishable”:

• I have lots of thoughts about what worked well, and what didn’t, at my former school, specifically on the institutional structure, the delivery of language instruction, and the MYP.
• I would like to see what response I will get if I respectfully and professionally approach my superiors at my new job and tell them that, with certain principles in place, I plan on blogging about my job.
• And now that I am poking around the world of academia, shouldn’t I be able to post ideas / responses to the work of my professors? After all, each professor here rings up thousands of hits on Google and has hundreds of citations on Google Scholar. My little blog would just be a drop in the bucket.

So to do all that, I must expand my definition of online professionalism. Where shall I start? With the guru, excuse me “Learner in Chief”, Will Richardson. Not to say I’m comparing myself to him – but I bet I can find a link or seven from there that will serve me just fine.

We’ll see what I come up with.

Comments (2)

By Jeff Pierce, 14 July 2009 06:46

A couple of significant developments in my career are taking place this summer, so I thought that it was time to say goodbye to my old blog over at blogger and start up my very own domain here.

First, I am finally getting started towards a Master’s degree, in International Education from the University of Bath. It’s part-time, so I’m going to be reading my way through two courses while working this coming school year.

And second, I decided to return to my previous employer, Hong Kong International School. However I’m not going back to the high school: I’ll be teaching grade 7 & 8 Social Studies. I will dearly miss everyone in the Secondary Division back at The ISF Academy – colleagues, administrators, staff, students, and parents – but it was time to go.

My aim is for this blog over the next year is that it will be a place where I am able to refine my thoughts on my coursework. I’m enrolled in two modules: Research Methods in Education, and Multilingual and Multicultural Education.

And…that’s all I’ve got for now. But I DO have plenty of questions / plans / next steps for this blog. I want a new theme and I don’t like the title. I hope my professors will let me mention them by name. And as I fall asleep, I wonder: will I be able to turn this into a Real Blog that Real People read, or will the realities of school life crush my hopes and dreams yet again?

Talk to you again soon!