<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Professionalism&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/</link>
	<description>reflections from a practitioner venturing into the world of research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 03:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the Other Side of the Brain &#187; Context Collapse</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Other Side of the Brain &#187; Context Collapse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreygene.net/?p=78#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] example, let&#8217;s look at my last post. Instead of putting my concerns online, I could have sent it to my school&#8217;s director of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] example, let&#8217;s look at my last post. Instead of putting my concerns online, I could have sent it to my school&#8217;s director of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Pierce</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreygene.net/?p=78#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Thanks folks! Damian, you are right, that is exactly where I am heading with this - how can I be authentic and also admit that there are warts in where I work?

I had always thought of it as something like not putting anything online that I wouldn&#039;t put in an all-users email, but I think that Kate&#039;s analogy is better. A blog is available to anyone, but it doesn&#039;t call attention to itself in the way that an email or face to face conversation does.

@Paul: in an ideal world I think you are right, but the fact that blogs are so public changes the situation.

Justin Hardman, my close friend and new supervisor, had an interesting take on this - &quot;don&#039;t write anything negative&quot;. Criticism needs to stay in-house.

In his view, an institution is failing if they are not providing employees with internal mechanisms for identifying and solving complaints / criticisms. If a teacher has to put their criticisms on a blog, that means that there are no administrators / supervisors inside the school who would listen or try to work toward a solution.

All of this leaves me at a slightly better place than where I was when I started. I think that the next step is to just start blogging and see how this feels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks folks! Damian, you are right, that is exactly where I am heading with this &#8211; how can I be authentic and also admit that there are warts in where I work?</p>
<p>I had always thought of it as something like not putting anything online that I wouldn&#8217;t put in an all-users email, but I think that Kate&#8217;s analogy is better. A blog is available to anyone, but it doesn&#8217;t call attention to itself in the way that an email or face to face conversation does.</p>
<p>@Paul: in an ideal world I think you are right, but the fact that blogs are so public changes the situation.</p>
<p>Justin Hardman, my close friend and new supervisor, had an interesting take on this &#8211; &#8220;don&#8217;t write anything negative&#8221;. Criticism needs to stay in-house.</p>
<p>In his view, an institution is failing if they are not providing employees with internal mechanisms for identifying and solving complaints / criticisms. If a teacher has to put their criticisms on a blog, that means that there are no administrators / supervisors inside the school who would listen or try to work toward a solution.</p>
<p>All of this leaves me at a slightly better place than where I was when I started. I think that the next step is to just start blogging and see how this feels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Nowak</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Nowak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreygene.net/?p=78#comment-32</guid>
		<description>My rule is like Damian&#039;s, except I usually frame it as &quot;don&#039;t say anything I wouldn&#039;t want published in the local paper.&quot; Same idea. I also don&#039;t talk about specific students or colleagues, unless it&#039;s complimentary. If I write something and worry that someone might take personal offense, I don&#039;t publish it, or I rewrite it. The &quot;Save as Draft&quot; button is a wonderful thing. I think there&#039;s room for professional disagreement and criticism as long as you retain respect and civility. d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My rule is like Damian&#8217;s, except I usually frame it as &#8220;don&#8217;t say anything I wouldn&#8217;t want published in the local paper.&#8221; Same idea. I also don&#8217;t talk about specific students or colleagues, unless it&#8217;s complimentary. If I write something and worry that someone might take personal offense, I don&#8217;t publish it, or I rewrite it. The &#8220;Save as Draft&#8221; button is a wonderful thing. I think there&#8217;s room for professional disagreement and criticism as long as you retain respect and civility. d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McMahon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McMahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreygene.net/?p=78#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Sometimes you just have to throw caution to the wind Jeff.

It is amazing to think that a learning institution that should be promoting discussion, openness, reflective practice and the great power of the critical friend might feel &quot;threatened&quot; by what someone like yourself puts on a blog. 

I would like to hope that we are all professional enough to give credit where due but also point out the weaknesses in the systems to which we give our blood, sweat and tears. If it is good enough for the kids it should be good enough for the place they attend and the administrators who work with them.

Hope to see you at the conference next month. 

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you just have to throw caution to the wind Jeff.</p>
<p>It is amazing to think that a learning institution that should be promoting discussion, openness, reflective practice and the great power of the critical friend might feel &#8220;threatened&#8221; by what someone like yourself puts on a blog. </p>
<p>I would like to hope that we are all professional enough to give credit where due but also point out the weaknesses in the systems to which we give our blood, sweat and tears. If it is good enough for the kids it should be good enough for the place they attend and the administrators who work with them.</p>
<p>Hope to see you at the conference next month. </p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreygene.net/2009/08/professionalism/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreygene.net/?p=78#comment-30</guid>
		<description>My short answer is to not say anything on my blog that I would not say directly to the faces of my direct supervisor, superintendent, or colleagues.  

I think there&#039;s an elephant in the room here (and I apologize in advance if this isn&#039;t where you were headed at some point) in the shape of criticizing or critiquing institutions you work for/study at/otherwise represent.

Being authentic doesn&#039;t mean you can&#039;t be critical of a program or policy, but I would definitely exercise caution in how you word/present it (and also make sure you have all the facts, or at least be transparent and admit when you don&#039;t, and what the implications of that could be).

It is possible to be transparent and authentic, as long as you respect the wishes of others who may not want to be as transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My short answer is to not say anything on my blog that I would not say directly to the faces of my direct supervisor, superintendent, or colleagues.  </p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s an elephant in the room here (and I apologize in advance if this isn&#8217;t where you were headed at some point) in the shape of criticizing or critiquing institutions you work for/study at/otherwise represent.</p>
<p>Being authentic doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t be critical of a program or policy, but I would definitely exercise caution in how you word/present it (and also make sure you have all the facts, or at least be transparent and admit when you don&#8217;t, and what the implications of that could be).</p>
<p>It is possible to be transparent and authentic, as long as you respect the wishes of others who may not want to be as transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
